Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Changes to the rules for offline Heroes 3 tournaments!
1. Play on the original version (SoD). The question is whether it is possible to hold Tournaments without interfering with the game's structure. Yes, by introducing restrictions on replaying battles by the tournament organizer, if the outcome of the battle depends on morale/luck. There will be a limited number of such complex battles, and players will not have difficulty (in case of any insurmountable doubts) requesting the organizer to check the legitimacy of the battle, and the organizer, in turn, will process a certain number of such requests. I suggest setting the number of restrictions on replaying a battle to 50.
Let's consider this issue from another angle. Suppose we introduce a so-called patch. Which game will the Tournament be held on then? Heroes 3? No. With the so-called patch, the combat mechanics are completely different, and therefore, no decent person would call this game Heroes 3. In this case, come up with a name for this new game.
2. Cancel the third criterion (mercury and some other resource). I'll explain why:
- The third criterion is simply unnecessary. Think of at least one Heroes 3 Tournament where the second criteria matched, and the third was not even a factor.
- In the vast majority of Tournaments, strong players push for maximum results. In addition to the difficulty of the map itself, the third criterion adds completely unnecessary hassle with resource gathering.
- It encourages players to use "traffic light" tactics to optimize losses, considering that there is almost always a Guardian on the map.
- The absence of the third criterion will further encourage players to "squeeze out" the maximum result. Even if the players have the same results according to the second criterion, it is quite fair to award prizes to both, of course, provided that the playthroughs are different.
3.
a) after the final battle.
b) taking into account artifacts (more options for strategy).
Everything else is fine. Just cancel the preliminary registration. I will definitely register an hour before the deadline for submitting saves.