The eternal question: which heroes are better, mages or warriors?

Let's define the terms.

A Warrior is a hero class where primary skills give more attack and defense than knowledge and strength, and secondary skills are more likely to be combat-related.

A Mage is the opposite, with primary and secondary skills.

A Battle Mage is a specific case of the Mage class. These are the mages of the Barbarian castle.

Warrior does not mean that they don't use spellbooks!
I gave an example of a battle without direct damage magic, which is what mages are valued for.
Slow, force field, and teleport. And the Nagas will die from the arrows of the Titans.

Added 2 minutes ago

2Forrest Again, Orrin in your case should be using magic. And that already makes him a battle mage!

Or did the poll author romantically call the Warrior class, which uses spellbooks, battle mages?

Added 1 minute ago

Added 3 minutes ago

With a large number of artifacts, it's much easier to turn a Warrior into a Mage than the other way around!! You can never have too much defense and attack, but you can have too much knowledge and magical power!

That's a good point. That's how it's done in real games. And there are more artifacts for Warriors, who develop faster and acquire utopias and relics more quickly.

And in general, you can defeat these Nagas with a Warrior who has 3 mana and 30 Titans (under certain circumstances. And how much mana do you need if 9000 damage per round from the Titans isn't enough? :) ) Is that 40 explosions of 10 each?