Questions, answers, and resolution of disputes regarding the online rating in HoMM5.

A ranking system? I don't think there's anything interesting about it. What kind of rating would I like to see? Just a regular table, like it is now. Maybe add arena numbers. But the table already has all the information that any player would be interested in. And if the table were updated once a week, that would be great.

Thank you for your opinion. I'll say right away that for now, I've only touched on the topic of ranking in online games on maps, which I plan to manage myself in the future. The ranking system is designed to give the bare numbers a more tangible and spectacular character, while the numbers that are called the rating will still remain, with the exception of simplifying its calculation: "win - 1 point," "lose - 0 points." I agree that with this scheme, several players may have the same rank or title at once, because to reach the next level, you will need to win, say, 5-10-15 games, but the one with the most wins will be listed first in the ranking table. All this scheme will be implemented in a table, where the first column will indicate the avatar of the corresponding rank, the second column will be the participant's nickname, and the third column will be the number of games won. A separate footnote may present the gradation: every beginner has the rank of "peasant," upon reaching 3 wins, the rank of "militiaman" is awarded, 7 - "landsknecht," 10 - "archer," 13 - "imperial archer," 15 - "sniper," and so on. The number of wins between transitions to the next rank is being discussed. In general, I have now outlined my idea in more detail, albeit in general terms.
P.S. In principle, if this kind of tracking system is acceptable to most people, I can organize tracking for online duels in the same way. I'm sure it's better than the "NOTHING" we have today.