Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
[HMM II OFF TOURNAMENT] 7th stage of the annual Van Kanigem tournament
Regarding the ROUND ROBIN – I’m not sure… I haven’t actually become a better player since last year. I just didn’t approach problem-solving systematically before. I played without scouting. Still, as a legacy of my local multiplayer battles at work, I have trouble with diplomacy. And, most importantly, I can’t force myself to replay from the very beginning. So, given that my opponents have enough time, my place is from 3rd to 5th. I’ve been told many times that I play very well, if in chess terms, when I have a material advantage. That is, in the context of Heroes, when a lot of factors are already interacting. But I don’t reach that point correctly. I was shocked by how badly I started the game in the 2nd joint match in Heroes II. And I almost won. Just now, in Heroes I, the same situation happened, and I even had a preliminary victory. If you’re interested, take a look. Yesterday, I realized that I could play according to my plan one day faster. If it weren’t for vbn’s participation, I would have simply said that the opponents played poorly, and that’s why I won.