SS-D
Auto-translated
If possible, I suggest the following change in the calculation of victory points:
As you know, we currently award about 50 points for the first victory over an opponent. For the second victory over the same opponent, we award fewer points, and even fewer for the third. And what happens is that an opponent over whom a player has achieved, say, 5 victories, occupies a high position in the table... from the point of view of competing for high places in the player ranking, while trying to combine "pleasure with benefit." :smile28:
The dependence of points on victories over one player is mandatory and not subject to discussion; otherwise, abuse is possible. The dependence of points on rating is quite normal, so there are no problems here.
But to make this dependence selective is too complicated.
Added 1 minute ago
Equal rating - equal change in case of victory for either player.
Added 6 minutes ago
Question. How should tournament games be properly recorded in the ranking table? Will this be done automatically, or do players need to duplicate them in the seasonal thread by prior agreement? If there is a ranking bonus for a place in the tournament, will considering the tournament games themselves as such be redundant?
If the organizer asked to record them, then it was done (Evgeny always did this with confirmation), but it is probably better if this is duplicated, perhaps with a link; otherwise, there will be confusion, someone will write, someone will not, and it is possible to credit a victory twice. It is best to duplicate.
So, we decide here how many points to give to avoid overcounting. :)
SS-D:smile17:
