On-line rating (discussion)

Dubrovin Pavel is right! The rating should not depend on how many games have been played, 5 or 10, but on the difference in rating, like in chess, for example. There, the whole world has a single rating, and everyone is happy with it. In my opinion (the numbers are conditional), it should be like this: Equal rating - equal change in case of victory for either player. And if one player has a rating of 1000, and the other has 100, then in case of victory, the first would gain 10-15 points (the second would lose the same amount), but if the second wins, he would gain 100-150, and the first would lose that much! And whether they played 1 game or 10 would not matter!