SEM_56 wrote:
After all, not everyone, like Dubrovin, can take 1st place by playing more games. And judging by the results of the spring season, this number is impressive (100). I ask you to take my note into account and resolve this, in my opinion, delicate issue, so that in the future there will be no complaints or dissatisfaction.
Sincerely, Assistant of the Senate of Darkness, Knight Apocalypse-Lawgiver clan SEM_56....

I agree, sometimes there is not enough time...
You can reach the top in different ways, and everyone chooses their own path, which they can handle at the moment.
Play 30-40 games and score about 1500 points, or 100 games and score the same amount. If my level of play allowed me to play fewer games (which I am, of course, striving for, but the opportunities do not allow (or may not allow) me to achieve this).I was misunderstood a bit. I'm talking about a limit for each player, so that they can play about 15 games per month. So that there is at least some balance. And I agree with Dubrovin, victory is achieved in different ways. Of course, it is still early for me to talk about victories, but I came here specifically for this. I found real tacticians and masters, and I am going to continue learning. I'm not even interested in playing with my friends anymore, I crush them. Their level is weak, and here I would be a beginner. Good luck to everyone, and may you have more sweet loot in the game and in life.:smile03: