Skip to content

A program for determining luck/morality in Heroes 3!

User Avatar
#178
Auto-translated
I want to share my humble opinion on a very serious accusation against one of the most respected and strongest players in the third game (both offline and online), namely, vbn. This is my first offline tournament, and I only managed to win a prize because I probably spent a lot of time on the map, and also thanks to Dirty (he helped me a lot, explaining the intricacies of the offline game). I don't personally know who Banana is, but I think he understands the weight of such accusations! Let's look at the situation from a slightly different angle: A very respected offline player, DmitryAS (in my opinion, he's about the same level as vbn), participated in the tournament and completed the map in one day (not playing). His result was in second place! I know vbn personally as one of the best online players in the third game (according to player votes, he's in the top seven online, which is a lot, although he specializes in offline). So, Vitalik worked on the map for a WHOLE MONTH. As far as I know, if he's not working, he's playing this offline tournament. And if we multiply DmitryAS's one-day result by his skill (as I already wrote in my opinion, it's approximately the same as vbn's), and by the entire tournament period, wouldn't that result raise any doubts? I personally fought the "Can" and "Titans" battles more than a HUNDRED times in total. Dirty has my saves of these battles; let the great minds try to generate a "Mass Slow" spell for the wizards in the first round, and then, with morale +1, luck 0, a force field, and 75 mana, kill the griffins (with one shot, the snipers killed about 10 griffins). I'm not saying it's impossible, just that it's very tedious and time-consuming. But that's just me, and what if someone has a lot of experience in this?! I wanted to say a lot more, but the censorship will cut it all out, so I'll keep quiet... In conclusion: a person sacrificed a month of their personal life, completed the map almost PERFECTLY, wrote the best report of all the ones I've read, with saves, with videos, explaining every detail. And they were simply unfairly criticized. Damn, it's disgusting, I swear! Think logically: if a person cheated, why would they write such a detailed report (even with battle videos)? Before, few people posted videos in their walkthroughs (at least, I didn't see any). Otherwise, they would have accused all the winners of cheating long ago, because they couldn't do it themselves! Ugh, it's disgusting! This was my first and last offline tournament! Sorry for the veiled profanity; please don't edit my post, as it will change the meaning of my thought. And you don't need to tell me that someone got a morale of 10 in a row or blindness 5 out of 5, and that it's impossible! I don't know anything about it and don't want to know, but nevertheless, I managed to generate what I needed, even if I spent about 500 attempts and a lot of personal time on it, but I achieved my goal! Someone may have generated a battle 10 times, and their friends tried it another ten times, but it didn't work. Damn, that means the one who succeeded is a cheater! And finally: play only with those you trust, as I do online! And you will have peace of mind. If something like this were presented to me, I would simply, frankly, and without hesitation tell them to go to hell!
Я ламер и играть не умею, нах!:smile33: