The first Offline Tournaments for Heroes 5!

What does "additional materials for verification, specifying WHO and WHAT materials" mean? How is VDV forever supposed to know where a player cheated? Therefore, the phrase "specific materials" sounds unconvincing. To accurately state that no cheats were used, you need to check the recorded battle log - are there too many units, too much money, is the hero moving too far in a single day, etc. And if nothing raises doubts, then you can say that no cheats were used.

I've already written about this. Let's say that from the 1st to the 3rd submissions, a full description of the game is provided. From the 4th and 5th, only screenshots and a description of the final battle are provided. I understand that you can't check everyone. And in this case, players don't know what place their save can potentially achieve without any preliminary information. The judge determines the criteria for who should write the description and forces the specified people to write a lengthy text. If he announced preliminary results, the player would decide for himself whether it's worth fighting for that place and writing a description. He has an alternative solution: to refuse to write a description and withdraw his save from the tournament. I don't know how many people completed it faster than 28 days. If, let's say, there are more than 10, I would withdraw my save just to avoid writing a description. But if there are only 3, I would gladly write a description to secure 4th place. But here, the judge tells me - if you want to write it, if you don't want to, it's up to you. If you don't write it, the save is considered cheating and is removed from the tournament. In my opinion, this is not right! I don't know what I should strive for and spend days writing a description for?! Just to please L.N. Tolstoy? :) Doesn't anyone think that someday they will find themselves in a similar situation? Would you like your result if you don't know your preliminary place, and you are asked to provide a detailed description day by day? And, to make matters worse, you won't have free time in real life. That's when you'll start to worry. But in this case, you probably won't be supported by anyone, except for me, of course. So, this point needs to be discussed in advance before the next tournament! And even if you don't have free time, but in the preliminary results, you see yourself in 1st place, you will probably find the time to write a description at night (now not like L.N. Tolstoy, but like V.I. Lenin!). :)

Added 2 hours 19 minutes ago

The first bug is incorrect. I finished exactly like that (all Castles -> Gilraen) and I get the 4th mission.

But I did it like this (2 Castles, Druids, 3rd Castle, Gilraen) and they say that I get the 5th mission. I think that shoot-nick played in a similar sequence. And I really managed to complete it in a month and see that if I replay it, I can complete it even faster using the same scheme. It turns out that you didn't eliminate the Druids. In that case, my question is, why does your mission end if not all the conditions of the map are met? The question of what mission comes next in light of this question is already secondary. In our case with shoot-nick, everything is completed ON THIS MAP. And I don't care what mission comes next.

It takes too much time to go to the Druids and then south. You probably won't even have time in a month...

Not probably, but DEFINITELY, it can be completed in a month. And there is clearly a margin of about a week or a little less! shoot-nick claims that he is playing on an unpatched, licensed version. Does anyone know how to tell the difference between a patched and an unpatched version? I have "Version 1.0" written in italic, slanted font on the left of the main menu on my main screen. Is this correct? I understand that on a patched version, there should be some letter after 1.0. Can anyone explain this clearly?