Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I, too, like Х®одо from Фы®а, apparently misunderstood your message :) I am looking forward to the results. You have a difficult task, dear VDV_Forever :) I don't envy you....
On the contrary, I understood everything perfectly - shoot-nick and IronAxe were supposed to provide a detailed description, since after mission 3, they have mission 5. Presumably, this is due to a violation of the championship rules (cheats or a patched game, or maybe something else). But I know one person who also has mission 5 after mission 3. He definitely didn't use cheats. You can simply ask him how he completed the mission, compare it with shoot-nick's and IronAxe's walkthroughs, and draw certain conclusions, which may mean that these people will not have to provide a description.VDV_forever
Why are you so worried? Everything is fine with you! Your save has also been counted :)! Wait for the final results!
Sincerely, VDV_forever
And I'm not worried. :D I think I did everything right, I even took a screenshot of the battle with Gilraen out of boredom. :rolleyes: IronAxe
Do you understand that it turns out that only fast results are suspected of cheating, but why not suspect slow ones!? I'm exaggerating. One completed it in 2 months, the other in 3. Both are far from the prize-winning places, but maybe the one who completed it in 2 months cheated unsuccessfully, and wouldn't the one who completed it honestly in three months feel bad about it? I suggest improving the announcement of results and checks. Fanat, look through the topic, there is my suggestion. The essence is this - the preliminary results should be announced immediately after the acceptance of saves. At the same time, a list of players who need to send additional materials for verification, indicating WHO and WHAT exactly materials. These players must confirm their willingness to fulfill these requirements within the time frame set by the judge. And after that, the final results will be announced. This is almost the same as you write in your post. I personally am in favor of such a thing.
Well said - cheated unsuccessfully. :p And what does "additional materials for verification, indicating WHO and WHAT exactly materials" mean? How will VDV forever know where a person cheated? Therefore, the phrase "certain materials" sounds unconvincing. To accurately say that cheats were not used, you need to check the uploaded battle log - are there too many units, too much money, does the hero move too far in a day, etc. And if nothing causes doubts, then you can talk about the absence of cheats.
