Alex_R
Auto-translated
...We are offered to play a match...
...and here we are, dividing the sandbox :) ...
1. Initially, I declined to participate due to the situation in real life, and besides, it wasn't certain that I would even make the team, but now there is more or less some clarity – I was voted into the starting lineup, and I have the opportunity to play a couple of games... I told Nagana in a private message, "I can easily play as a substitute, but only as a main player depending on the regulations" (which I still haven't seen, although the team composition should be based on it to some extent).
2. Selecting the strongest players through seasonal standings or player voting – both options provide a distorted picture (more or less). We should have decided how to select players from the beginning... if voting was supported and took place, why raise this issue again now? ...
...if someone is not satisfied with the results, they either need to accept it or offer alternatives, and we can discuss them quickly and clearly...
3. And in general, I don't understand how the players who can play for a specific resource are determined... sometimes, simply expressing a desire is enough...
...and by the way, does the atmosphere happen to encourage kicking players while they're down in case of poor performance? :)
P.S. I think it's been a long time since we should have started preparing (in all areas) for the match.
...and here we are, dividing the sandbox :) ...
1. Initially, I declined to participate due to the situation in real life, and besides, it wasn't certain that I would even make the team, but now there is more or less some clarity – I was voted into the starting lineup, and I have the opportunity to play a couple of games... I told Nagana in a private message, "I can easily play as a substitute, but only as a main player depending on the regulations" (which I still haven't seen, although the team composition should be based on it to some extent).
2. Selecting the strongest players through seasonal standings or player voting – both options provide a distorted picture (more or less). We should have decided how to select players from the beginning... if voting was supported and took place, why raise this issue again now? ...
...if someone is not satisfied with the results, they either need to accept it or offer alternatives, and we can discuss them quickly and clearly...
3. And in general, I don't understand how the players who can play for a specific resource are determined... sometimes, simply expressing a desire is enough...
...and by the way, does the atmosphere happen to encourage kicking players while they're down in case of poor performance? :)
P.S. I think it's been a long time since we should have started preparing (in all areas) for the match.