Пандора
Auto-translated
Regarding the "distorting" of history: yes, Rezun, from the perspective of Soviet historiography, distorts the truth about the war with his works, but, on the other hand, Vladimir Bogdanovich, with his statements (for example, that the purge of the Red Army's high command before the war was not an act of idiocy, but a manifestation of Stalin's military genius, and that the General Secretary himself was not a cretin, but almost a sage), rather EMBELLISHES the "life and structure of Soviet society" than distorts it. So, saying that Suvorov-Rezun "distorts" something is incorrect.
Respected Gur, it's nice to see the principle of dialectics even in such dubious "research": D At least it's something...
yes, Rezun, from the perspective of Soviet historiography, distorts the truth about the war
If this phrase reflects your fundamental position regarding the books of Mr. Suvorov-Rezun, then I consider further discussion simply pointless. :)