Auto-translated
First of all, IronAxe:
I never do anything thoughtlessly!!!
Secondly, the scheme you propose is already being used by me when summarizing the results (with some minor deviations), so don't think you've discovered something new :D.
It's simple: I requested descriptions from those who completed the game in less than 28 days.
But in my opinion, you are changing your decisions and rules on the fly. I completed the game in exactly 28 days. And you are writing that descriptions should be provided by those who completed it faster than 28 days. I don't fall into this category.
If you now say that you suspected me of cheating, I will answer that why not suspect the player who completed it in
6 MONTHS of cheating. Maybe he also cheated, but not very well. Ask him for a description too :D
So, are you still demanding a description from me, violating your own rules, or will you still accept my save? I sent a detailed description of the final battle and screenshots from it.
In my opinion, this is enough for such a result as mine, don't you think?
And if 30 people completed the game faster than 28 days, what, should everyone write descriptions :)
It's much easier to identify the top three from them based on additional parameters that are specified in the tournament rules and ask for descriptions only from them. Don't you care about your own time? It's one thing to check 30 playthroughs, and another to check only 3.
Is there a difference? Do you feel it :)