A few words from the sidelines. 1. Tournament organizers and judges often don't have the opportunity to play themselves. Because first, you choose the map, create the rules, and generate the save file. Then, you start encouraging the players. Then, questions start coming in privately or as open questions on the forum. Sometimes, you have to moderate immediately because some questions reveal the walkthrough. Then, the save files start arriving, and they need to be checked!!! Sometimes, people break the rules unintentionally... But after the tournament ends, there are often complaints like "how long will this take, where are the results, etc.," but at least the save files need to be checked initially. Therefore, at the end of the tournament, the judge is already checking the save files... 2. In the second game, which is what I represent, it's a completely normal situation: there are two versions of the game. They are connected in a single menu, and only when loading a save file/map does it offer to go to either the updated saves/maps or the old ones. And they are all in the same folder, although the extensions are different. And no one is shouting, "I don't want to play the old map, it doesn't have stables," or "remove the new one, it allows you to recruit annoying elementals, and the necromancer is unbalanced because he can raise 10% more skeletons." Everyone plays, everyone knows the difference between the versions, and I don't remember any problems. 3. The ban on bugs and other exploits. When the "ballista kill" exploit appeared, I left the third game and never came back. In the second game, there are a few nuances, like extracting any artifact from the graveyard. So what? They added a ban to the rules, and good judges also try to remove graveyards and other similar objects from the map. In general, if Equilibris removes a bug with a closed hiding spot, maybe we should play on it. This is just my opinion. P.S. Friends, it's not easy for judges and tournament organizers. Let's be more understanding and kind...