We are offered to play a match.

Gentlemen. Everything discussed here is, of course, good. But I hope it doesn't end up like HeroesWorld vs. Heroes.by...

I don't think so. I read the thread, and it seems they didn't take them seriously back then. Here, the leader of an online player guild proposed his own terms. He is a person who has successfully organized and, most importantly, conducted many tournaments. He has an excellent reputation. We talked to him, and he will, of course, take responsibility for all issues within his own forum. He only asked me to post an announcement on our forum. As I understand it, he also spoke with Dreamcatcher and Loy, and they also approve of his position. Why not support an energetic person who can benefit our community?
I think the chances of winning will be 50/50.

During the discussion, it turned out that a team of 5 people for Might and Magic 2 and, apparently, Might and Magic 4 is too many; there aren't enough players to form a team. And for us, and possibly for those who prefer 5-player games, it's too few.
So that 2-player and 4-player teams don't feel disadvantaged, I suggested counting not the total number of wins, but the wins per version.
There are a total of 4 online versions: Might and Magic 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Let's assume that a team of 3 people plays Might and Magic 2 and 4, and a team of 7 players plays Might and Magic 3 and 5.
Let's say two versions are won, and two are lost. Then it's a draw in the match. If we win three out of four versions, we win; if we lose three out of four, we lose.

And each group of players agrees with their neighbors on the rules and composition. I think we have the right to insist on a minimum team of 7 people. I would like to ask the respected Dreamcatcher, who plays on both resources, to post the rules of the game on the Portal's random map, or provide a link. And to explain the main differences from our rules. Thank you in advance.