Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I agree with the previous post.
As an option – if technically feasible, leave the database system in the old interface only for battle reports (I’m talking about the online version of Heroes 3) because for the report creator, a clear representation of the database as applied to a specific report is a powerful moral incentive to write detailed and vivid reports (I speak both on my own behalf and on behalf of many who mainly leave their posts only in battle reports).
P.S. I think that making comments mandatory is a good idea, as it prevents the use of the database as a memo for oneself, such as "yes, I reviewed the post – this isn't a problem; we'll get used to it." But the above-described problem of losing usability is critical and noticeable immediately; there is no need for any test period for this. I hope that the collective opinion of volunteer testers of this system will draw the developer's attention to this problem.
Стратегия - искусство возможного.
Первое правило форума : "Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно И не оспаривай глупца" (с)
Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу): Правила онлайн игр