Hero Chat

The avatar isn't from Fallout at all.
Pip-Boy is, but there isn't exactly that image in the game.
Heh, that's how meticulous I am.
Well, since we're on the subject, I also changed the Castle, as you can see.
In my opinion, Conflux is the most beautiful, a true work of art.
All these mountains, valleys, waterfall, and the pleasant shapes of the buildings...
Neither the Castle, nor the Rampart, nor, God forbid, the Tower can compare.
And the alignment remained good, only changed from lawful to chaotic.
Well, that's how it is in life, too. ;D
It's a pity that I can't change the avatar yet. But it's okay, in a couple of days...

The avatar is related to the Fallout setting, and... stop making up excuses.
And yes, IMHO, the elementals' alignment is truly neutral; the only reason they intervened in the war between Erathia and Kreg was to maintain balance, because otherwise the world would have been destroyed. So you're completely wrong, Lock. :p
Oh, I feel sorry for you; it's unpleasant when an interesting dream is interrupted, but there's something even more unpleasant – what I dream about. I dream of almost real life (with some exceptions, in the form of small deviations from reality). And I never dream of anything extraordinary or, God forbid, magical. In reality, it's routine, and in my dreams, it's routine too, brr, a nightmare.

Added 1 hour 55 minutes ago
Hmm... I went to external forums and came across an interesting topic where they discussed why there are so many idiots (hooligans, sluts, just imbeciles, etc.) around. At first, they discussed it normally ("yes, there really are a lot of hooligans") and then it started... "If the author can't communicate on the same topics as everyone else, then the problem is with him, not with society."
+1, I think these people are completely inadequate.
-Yeah, exactly, they're just nerds who should live like everyone else; they're annoying with their pretentiousness.
-Normal people don't blame others; they look for problems in themselves!
The last point was especially striking. Here, you involuntarily start to agree with Lock: "What serves as a measure of normality? And who came up with these 'norms'?"
Sorry for the rambling; I'm writing this under the impression.