and there’s no need to start an argument if the goal is to prove the validity of not just one option, but both. what’s the point of the discussion then? huh? that’s right, it approaches zero. therefore, I would ask you not to pretend to be smart and not talk about the importance of both things if you need to prove only one. the participant in the argument looks absurd and comical in this case.
and then, here is my last post. it comments on the opponent’s thought and is supplemented by my statements. and? is there nothing to say about this? has all the bile drained out, leaving behind an empty shell? then it’s better to close the topic.