Shogun
Auto-translated
What is there to review? The Zenit player managed to deflect the ball with his leg and bring it down; otherwise, the Bayern players would have been sidelined for quite a while. He just didn't manage to stop the momentum. In the fight for the ball, someone always fouls first, and there's contact, so should the second player always be penalized? Besides formalism, there should be some logic. That's why, after reviewing the replay, Advokat clearly and confidently said that there was no penalty. The moment was, at the very least, debatable.
1. There are the rules of football and the methodological guidelines of FIFA/UEFA. Everything else is from the devil.
2. Have you ever seen a coach who said that a penalty against his team was definitely there? :eek:
It's not at all the same. In the case in the German penalty area, the ball was heading towards the GOAL (and there wasn't even a goalkeeper there), which is no longer up to the referee's discretion, but a clear penalty. And if you consider the handball intentional (although I personally wouldn't), then it's a last-man foul and a red card.
Stop – pause. It seems we're talking about different episodes. I was talking about the fact that (as it seemed to me) during that attack, in the scramble near the corner of the penalty area, the ball bounced off someone's hand from Bayern. There was no hand during the shot on goal (when it went past the defender and the goalkeeper who came out (what was he doing there? :confused: )). That was 5-7 seconds later.
I suggest we return to this episode later (on Sunday), when I have the opportunity to watch the match again and all the controversial moments.
Порою люди не со зла
Творят настолько черные дела,
Что до таких блистательных идей
Не вдруг дойдет и записной Злодей
Темный адепт клана GODS
Творят настолько черные дела,
Что до таких блистательных идей
Не вдруг дойдет и записной Злодей
Темный адепт клана GODS