kcfgogbfalgfl
Auto-translated
No one disputes the cunning (and, of course, the treachery) of the Sith; take Palpatine, for example. Isn't he cunning? Isn't he treacherous? He is a prime example of a Sith. And I don't think anyone would argue that a Sith's life is easier.
Take Knights of the Old Republic, for example; doing good deeds is difficult (and not profitable), while dark deeds are quite easy (and profitable). So, it turns out:
You put in a lot of effort, and then you don't get anything for it (that's just the life of a Jedi).
You practically do nothing, and then you even get paid for it (this is naturally the path of the Sith).
Take Knights of the Old Republic, for example; doing good deeds is difficult (and not profitable), while dark deeds are quite easy (and profitable). So, it turns out:
You put in a lot of effort, and then you don't get anything for it (that's just the life of a Jedi).
You practically do nothing, and then you even get paid for it (this is naturally the path of the Sith).