Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Dear Timi,
I absolutely agree with you that my definition of money turned out to be somewhat vague. It became so because I tried to reflect the ESSENCE of money as clearly as possible. However, I believe that your definition ("money is a means to achieve material goods") is more acceptable in this regard. The only thing is, I have a question: is money a means to achieve ONLY material goods? I don't think so. Let me explain: for example, when we pay a certain amount for a theater ticket, we are not acquiring something material, but rather something spiritual. Therefore, I suggest slightly adjusting your definition: money is a means to achieve something.
Thus, we have:
1) Love is an attitude towards someone (something) as important (valuable) to us.
2) Money is a means to achieve something.
Do you agree with this?
Sincerely,
Gur