Voting. Round 2 "Recruit Set"

Where are... where, if it's not a secret, the people who have access to moderating this section? Moderators, coordinators, or whoever else knows what they're doing. I would give them a negative rating with the explanation "for inaction." It's surprising that something like this hasn't been removed yet. The reputation of the resource is growing in inverse proportion to the number of such discussions.
:smile38:

Oh, esteemed users, it seems we've developed a "fine" tradition of criticizing the administration. It's not this, it's not that. We delete posts with conflicts, and we get criticized for suppressing conflicts and not knowing how to resolve them in any other way (they start giving instructions). We don't delete them, and we get another negative rating. Go ahead, give us negative ratings; you yourselves started this mess, so let's resolve it like civilized people and come to a consensus. Ideally, the organizer should have monitored compliance with the rules of the stage in advance and not posted works with violations; then there would have been no reason to raise a fuss. And the forum members should think about the reputation of the Hive before they start arguing, because they are all too ready to make a mess in the topics, but then the administration is to blame for everything. Do they not have brains in their heads? (So, the participants themselves should delete what they said in the heat of the moment; there isn't a single active moderator in this section).
Here, oxygen_hl, is a post right here where you can give negative ratings without even looking far.