Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
one person giving a 5-star rating is not indicative; it's an exception. If such a poll were placed, let's say, on a forum dedicated to games in general, various and any, there would be n number of people who would rate it lower than five, and based on these figures, one could at least judge the overall popularity of the game. But such a poll does not have objectivity, and in my opinion, the reasons are obvious: social polls are always conducted among a random sample of people, and not among people with a high probability of being fans of the object of the poll. if the intention is to compare the parts, then the poll should have been structured differently. why is this a strange question, because I really enjoy playing it: I'm a player, not a magazine critic.