Alex_R
Auto-translated
We continue: D
And shnurov_hl and Andrey – you are both essentially correct, but while shnurov_hl likely backs up his words with actions (even if on a different platform), you, Andrey, just want to criticize...
We don't have a team of perfect moderators and coordinators, and it doesn't look like we will anytime soon.
What good will criticism and disrespect towards them and their work do?
Besides, you can't rely on enthusiasm alone for long, and Kyle, Alan, and many others are examples of that... so why destroy the enthusiasm that we do have?
Of course, completely eliminating criticism is also not an option – but at least we should maintain some respect; otherwise, what happens:
Xaker should be removed, Adelaide should be removed... remove half of the moderators, and then what? ... are they taking up someone's place? Are there people who want to be coordinators? Are you sure that a new coordinator will be better than the previous one?
P.S. I believe that inactive members should be replaced (but only when there are new candidates; otherwise, we'll end up with sections where there isn't a single "active" moderator) – and the rest should be treated with more respect, and if you criticize, do it in a friendly manner – then it will be useful, IMHO.
And shnurov_hl and Andrey – you are both essentially correct, but while shnurov_hl likely backs up his words with actions (even if on a different platform), you, Andrey, just want to criticize...
We don't have a team of perfect moderators and coordinators, and it doesn't look like we will anytime soon.
What good will criticism and disrespect towards them and their work do?
Besides, you can't rely on enthusiasm alone for long, and Kyle, Alan, and many others are examples of that... so why destroy the enthusiasm that we do have?
Of course, completely eliminating criticism is also not an option – but at least we should maintain some respect; otherwise, what happens:
Xaker should be removed, Adelaide should be removed... remove half of the moderators, and then what? ... are they taking up someone's place? Are there people who want to be coordinators? Are you sure that a new coordinator will be better than the previous one?
P.S. I believe that inactive members should be replaced (but only when there are new candidates; otherwise, we'll end up with sections where there isn't a single "active" moderator) – and the rest should be treated with more respect, and if you criticize, do it in a friendly manner – then it will be useful, IMHO.