Skip to content

Dialogues with Moderators

User Avatar
#34
Auto-translated
ZYbr;165350
I’ll add my two cents to the “discussion”…
(I didn’t want to emphasize it before, but now I will definitely say it)
Your two cents were the root cause of this dispute, IMHO.
ZYbr;165350
If you really don’t want to moderate, then please, review the submitted candidates, and give them support; this way, you’ll save your time and kill two birds with one stone, or is this also not within your competence, or maybe there isn’t enough time for it…
As far as I understand the situation, the topic about selecting new moderators was created for the “Admin,” and the candidates were chosen by the forum members, not appointed by the coordinator… therefore, the complaints are inappropriate, especially since the comparison is with a situation that is completely different from this one.
ZYbr;165350
A beautiful phrase, it’s almost painful to look at. Maybe, for the prosperity of the portal, it’s worth listening to the opinions of its users?
An ugly phrase – it’s no less painful to look at (-1) – you get a point for populism.
ZYbr;165350
An example is needed, please.
Let’s find the old topic about selecting moderators.
What were its results? Not impressive, right?
The administration looked, looked, said that the candidates were considered, and then silence… it’s unclear whether they were approved or not, or if there are just some delays… only guesses remain….
Missing the point… let’s look at the date of the “old topic about selecting moderators” and the date when Adelaide and the other coordinators took office – they definitely know about the old topic.