5 worst games.

The culture of the forum lies precisely in the respectful attitude towards all its visitors. First of all, one should set a personal example. What is happening here? A young man registers on the forum, possibly for the first time in his life. He starts writing, as best he can. But his posts immediately cause rejection from some visitors. For what reason is another question. They start giving him negative ratings. The young man sees this behavior and thinks that it is generally accepted. He begins to do the same in response, but instead receives reprimands for unjustified reduction of his rating. What do you think the child feels at this moment? Only monstrous injustice and resentment towards the whole world. Moreover, a whole crowd of indignant regulars attacks the young visitor. Do you think this is how you will correct him? It would be much better if one of you took him under your wing, explained to him how he should behave, and told him about the culture of communication on forums.

Catch, your position reminds me of the fight against racism in the USA. That is, the "oppressors" no longer know where to go from the "oppressed." Do you even notice that our dear little one is reducing everyone's rating in the entire topic, while you, with an apostolic look, call for forgiveness? This is not humanism, but indulgence! When a child eats not with a spoon, but with his hands, he is taught, not told: "Oh, well, he's small, what can you do with him..." He will remain "small" if no one points out his mistakes. And believe me, many users have tried to reason with him gently and kindly. But nothing changes - he behaves the same way, and this gentleness doesn't help, it's obvious to everyone.
Here is another one of his topic. How can you even communicate on a forum where such a user is raging (sorry, but this is the most accurate epithet!)?
Now this Anika-warrior has declared war on me and is reducing my rating for every message. It seems that it is me who can no longer write on the forum, and not him, dear defender of the rights of spammers, Catch!

The rating exists to express approval or disapproval of a message, not of the user. If you don't like him, that's not a reason to give him negative ratings for every word he says.

What was the point of this (undoubtedly fair) phrase, for example?
Yes, everyone disliked that a person created a topic about how the 1st and 2nd Heroes games are the worst. And for this topic and this message, his rating was reduced. Not for a bad hairstyle or some age (by the way, I usually don't care about the user's age), but specifically for the messages. Or now, for every negative rating given to him, will he have to explain, proving that it is not out of personal dislike, but for the message?

And in general, haven't we all been like that? Don't you remember yourself at that age? Don't you remember your inner world?

Catch, when I was 9, I didn't break into a symposium and start making absurd speeches, interrupting the speakers.
The analogy is extremely simple and clear, I think?
If a person can only communicate at this level, he has no place here. There are many forums with appropriate users, let him start with them. But the fact that our forum should take care of an aggressive child, you have not convinced me, I'm sorry. He is not the only child here, by the way. But he is the only enfant terrible.