Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Mos.keenStatistics
Registered:
Posts:103
#257
Auto-translated
Fireball;161051
It all depends on the number of friendly and enemy secondary towns. If we have a classic distribution, like a starting town + 2 enemy secondary towns (or something similar), and some dwellings, then a Necromancer (leveling up on low-level fortresses) is a good choice.
But why, if there are secondary towns, should a Necromancer use zombies instead? It's much more convenient to place a level 4 building for vampires or, at worst, a level 5 building for liches – that's clearly more useful. As for humans, I would still bet on them because with a few trainings and mass upgrades to cavalry, they can tear through poor Paladins, not so much with speed, but with their numbers... So, in my opinion, in the late game with additional (with any, actually) castles, the Necropolis faction crushes everyone, and then come humans and Inferno (one with training, the other with summoning), and the rest, well, probably except for Gnomes, are not viable... :)
Главное в любом деле - руки + удача. а остальное не так важно=))