Auto-translated
Hello.
First of all, I want to share my thoughts on the article in the magazine. I also bought this magazine and read the article; it didn't seem that bad to me. Yes, it describes many things that no one would actually do... for example, you're right, Archmages 58+1+1 is ridiculous, but there is definitely one correct point in it: it stated that some of the strongest heroes on a duel server are undead, and that's true (check my reports in the "Irreconcilable Hostility" tournament). I haven't lost a single match with Orson yet.
And also, regarding Haghesh versus Jalib... it's not that hopeless. I managed to win with Haghesh against Jalib (again, in the report for the "Irreconcilable Hostility" tournament, I think it was my very first report), although it was very difficult.
Now, about the heroes...
The thing is, we still need to decide which heroes we will be discussing... should we include heroes that are almost always excluded (Sinithar, Helmar, Karil, Nimue, Ossir, etc.)?
First of all, I want to share my thoughts on the article in the magazine. I also bought this magazine and read the article; it didn't seem that bad to me. Yes, it describes many things that no one would actually do... for example, you're right, Archmages 58+1+1 is ridiculous, but there is definitely one correct point in it: it stated that some of the strongest heroes on a duel server are undead, and that's true (check my reports in the "Irreconcilable Hostility" tournament). I haven't lost a single match with Orson yet.
And also, regarding Haghesh versus Jalib... it's not that hopeless. I managed to win with Haghesh against Jalib (again, in the report for the "Irreconcilable Hostility" tournament, I think it was my very first report), although it was very difficult.
Now, about the heroes...
The thing is, we still need to decide which heroes we will be discussing... should we include heroes that are almost always excluded (Sinithar, Helmar, Karil, Nimue, Ossir, etc.)?



