Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Discarding 50% of the results is simply excessive. What's the point of having multiple stages and the organizer putting in so much effort? It's easier to run just one tournament and not overexert oneself.
It would be acceptable to discard one or two results, depending on the number of stages, but in any case, keeping less than 75% of the results undermines the very essence of a multi-stage tournament.
And determining the winner based on their overall ranking seems like the simplest and fairest approach.
However, there's an opinion that the difference in results (days) won't be taken into account. But in that case, it's necessary to choose one or consider both of these aspects.