Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I don't see any practical sense in this idea. Through constructive discussions, our forum's mathematically and analytically-minded members have repeatedly determined the optimal number of players for an objective comparison of clans – that's 4 people. The result of this discussion is a clan rating, which is quite adequate and balanced, and no one disputes it.
Although, by the way, comparing with other clans based on just one best player for "Homo Homini" is certainly a more advantageous option, but I have already expressed my opinion on the necessity and objectivity of this idea.