Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
:confused: GvozD, I don't share your faith in the goodness of Nival; it's not possible for a beta version to differ significantly (let alone radically) from the final version. And it's unlikely that Nival will be the first to become such a headache, radically reworking the beta. I think the outcome is already predetermined. <flame and unsubstantiated statements> However, Nival probably isn't too concerned about this; the game will be bought by many fans of the series who were swayed by the name and didn't bother to visit this forum, and Nival will still get its modest profits. But this won't increase respect for Nival. And shifting the blame to Ubi won't help here – Ubi has established itself as a company that produces quality games. Perhaps Ubi is rushing the release of the game because the game's graphics are already outdated and initially mediocre (despite the praises that Nival sings to itself), and in a year, it will be completely terrible. :mad: :eek: Just listen to this song about the small number of polygons: they made their lives easier and are presenting it as a brilliant discovery! And as a result, we have square trees and hexagonal spears. Well, for 1998, it's not bad! :( In my ears, I hear the death knell for Heroes.