Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The Antichrist, because there's no need to add anything else. Tengro said it right. Some hobbit is mowing down orcs by the dozens, and then, as if he has nothing better to do, he takes out their captain, who is definitely a better fighter. And I also liked what he said about mithril. What were those small creatures with large bows called? Hazgi, I think? Do they have a bow shot that sends a person flying several meters? And do you think impenetrable armor will save you from breaking all your bones? By the way, we need to remember that in Tolkien, it wasn't impenetrable at all, just very strong, but here... nothing penetrates it. I don't like how he added that, and besides, everything is clear right away. If the main characters are fighting someone, they will definitely win. Also, for example, in "The Wolfhound," although I admit that Perumov's sequel is several times better than "The Wolfhound" itself. Also in "The Witcher," but in "The Witcher," it's not always like that, and besides, everything is justified there, and besides, Perumov is very far from Sapkowski, not just far, but Perumov is simply not in the same league. Although, in principle, he is a pretty good writer.
Step aside from the way of a better man than you So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you Its the servants devotion for the decay Stand up