Перполькен
Auto-translated
After all, how will the winner of the first scenario be determined, by points or by rating?
It was previously stated that there would be 7 scenarios, and a medal would be awarded at the end of each.
The rules on the first page state: to win a scenario, you need to score as many points as possible in the stages that are part of that scenario. Points are calculated using the formula…
Naturally, I am in favor of sticking to the game rules, that is, judging by points, and not only because I will be first in points.
In my opinion, a table based on points is much fairer than one based on rating. No matter how you change the stages, the sum will remain the same. That is, each stage is important. This cannot be said about the rating; if you change the order of the stages, the result changes. That is, the last stage is much more important than the previous one, which is unfair.
A rating, by definition, should not be rewarded. Since it runs parallel to the game (just like in sports) and is constantly changing. If a medal is awarded based on the rating, there will constantly be confusion, and you will be wondering whether to send me the result or wait for the stage in which I will definitely show the maximum number of days.
Ideally, I see the rating tied to a cycle of games. That is, when the cycle repeats, the first game from the previous cycle is removed.
This is my opinion. But whatever the management decides, that’s what will happen.
It was previously stated that there would be 7 scenarios, and a medal would be awarded at the end of each.
The rules on the first page state: to win a scenario, you need to score as many points as possible in the stages that are part of that scenario. Points are calculated using the formula…
Naturally, I am in favor of sticking to the game rules, that is, judging by points, and not only because I will be first in points.
In my opinion, a table based on points is much fairer than one based on rating. No matter how you change the stages, the sum will remain the same. That is, each stage is important. This cannot be said about the rating; if you change the order of the stages, the result changes. That is, the last stage is much more important than the previous one, which is unfair.
A rating, by definition, should not be rewarded. Since it runs parallel to the game (just like in sports) and is constantly changing. If a medal is awarded based on the rating, there will constantly be confusion, and you will be wondering whether to send me the result or wait for the stage in which I will definitely show the maximum number of days.
Ideally, I see the rating tied to a cycle of games. That is, when the cycle repeats, the first game from the previous cycle is removed.
This is my opinion. But whatever the management decides, that’s what will happen.
Все гениальное-просто!
:) F A I R :) P L A Y[/COLOR]:)
