Auto-translated
VDV_forever:
I don't really trust the auto-battle... the AI doesn't think the same way in battle; it all depends on the player's skill and the troops...
I have a suggestion:
Describe the battle as Lap1976 suggested, i.e., from a tactical point of view, and if questions arise, then request a detailed description. This will save time and nerves for everyone.
I have a large battle log (generated during the battle)... if I have to rewrite it, it will take about 2 hours... but describing it tactically will only take 5-10 minutes.
And if describing it tactically, it should include the strengths and weaknesses of the opponent and yourself (in principle, a tactical description of the battle should start with this).
Well, I agree, we can get by with a tactical description, but it should be normal and understandable (so that it can be shown to everyone who wants to see it!). But if questions arise, and they may, then I'm sorry, I'll have to describe it step by step. :)
Added 1 hour 16 minutes ago
Isn't it right for the organizers to participate in what they organize??? (Question about the tournament)
And why not??? I don't think I'll win first place:(. I don't have much time, it went by quickly, and I wasn't playing thoughtfully:D