Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
However, the Battle Gryphons return to their starting position after their attack, instead of staying in the middle of the battlefield, as if saying, "Go ahead, attack whoever you want."
Looking at the stats of both types of gryphons, it's immediately clear that the Royal Gryphons are designed for attack, while the Battle Gryphons are designed for defense. I think the choice will depend more on the enemy race. For example, against demons, with their high attack power, the Battle Gryphons are a very good choice. Especially in combination with strong defense and readiness. Fortunately, it's not difficult for humans to increase readiness. They also look decent against orcs. However, if the enemy has chaos magic, which they can use to effectively attack the gryphons, or darkness with dispel, then there won't be much point.
Royal Gryphons are, in my opinion, more versatile. Although they die quite quickly, they can still bring more benefit than the Battle Gryphons, which move 1.5 times slower. And the attack, which can seriously injure archers, or at least force them to move, is also a significant advantage.
O God of Earth and Altar, Bow down and hear our cry, Our earthly rulers falter, Our people drift and die, The walls of gold entomb us, The swords of scorn divide, Take not thy thunder from us, Take away our pride.