Continuing the discussion, let's have a serious conversation.

Hmm, the topic hasn't been closed yet? Well, in that case, I'll share my point of view, especially since I already wrote something in the first thread. First of all, Survival expressed his opinion as he sees it, without fearing the obviously negative opinion of the majority. I respect him for that, and there were some valid points in his post. But HOW he wrote it... He didn't consider at all that it might deeply offend someone, and religion is a serious matter. Especially since it was his first post on the forum, and he immediately wrote something like that... It's at least unwise. And it's also rude to attack Survival with insults. But I, for example, didn't resort to insults; I tried to refute what I disagreed with, providing arguments. By the way, regarding the "Bad Post" rating: it's silly to lower it just because you disagree with what's written in the post. I don't really see much point in lowering the "Bad Post" rating, because it won't change anything, and it's much easier to click the button than to provide your own solid counter-arguments if you disagree. (I only lowered the "Bad Post" rating once – I couldn't resist). And increasing it without a good reason also seems silly to me. That's why I have so few increases; I only do it if I see a truly well-written and worthwhile post.
P.S. Please don't attack me for what I wrote here. The topic is not closed, and maybe the moderators will pay more attention.