HumanSt
Auto-translated
This isn't confirmation;)
Don't forget, I had Darkness, but the second time, as agreed, I didn't use it. 6 levels down the drain. If there wasn't Darkness, there would be something else.
I'm just referring to a situation where the opponent has both Darkness and Summoning (which is the case in more than half of the situations – the standard "gentleman's set" for a Necromancer). And in this case, Anti-Summoning would be more effective than Anti-Darkness, in my opinion.
1) It's almost bullying the dumb AI – it killed almost as many of its own dragons as you did.
2) You had a hero, and the AI was playing with free monsters.
3) There were definitely more than just Phoenixes.
4) You actively used Phantoms, and no Anti-Summoning would have helped against that.
5) The Phoenix was strong, but not invincible!
6) The hero was very strong! I have nothing against good leveling up before a battle, but you have to agree that you can only level up a hero THAT much if you have an agreement with the opponent; otherwise, you will meet MUCH sooner.
However, we got carried away and forgot what we started with.
So:
I believe that Anti-Darkness is necessary, but Anti-Summoning is not, because fighting a hero with a leveled-up Summoning skill without Anti-Summoning is very unpleasant, but quite possible. But fighting a hero with a leveled-up Darkness skill without Anti-Darkness is a GUARANTEED DEFEAT.
For this reason, if the choice is "either - or" (you can, of course, level up both), I think it is advisable to level up Anti-Darkness and not level up Anti-Summoning!
That's my overall thought. Are you going to argue???