Thoughts about the Antichrist.

Lock, I'm not yelling; I'm just upset about the issue of my origins. I mean, if someone asked me about who I associate with or someone who showed me how to be a pleasant conversationalist, that would be understandable, but why does it matter to him? He's even going to judge what I'm like, and that's what bothers me. However, I was calm for the rest of the post.
Furthermore, I didn't say that Christianity is bad, notice. Find those words in my posts, and I'll edit them and even apologize to Neo. But I didn't say that, and I respect any faith, as long as it's not completely idiotic. I don't consider Christianity to be such, just as I don't consider Islam to be. Again, just like any religion.
By the way, the word "heretic" generally means "one who does not revere the religion that we revere":) Well, I'm just using that figuratively, so as not to give an example.
It's not necessarily true that believers are weak-spirited; it's either because a person has been taught this since childhood, or because something not so simple has influenced the person, which they consider to be divine intervention, or because of a weak spirit. In general, a person needs to believe in something, not necessarily in God. They need to... And you can invent a religion yourself.
Neo, everything is clear in your post, but maybe you should reread mine and Catcha's? Where does it say that all Christians are bad? It says that they are not all innocent lambs.
The idea of the Antichrist may belong to the Bible, although there are similar concepts in almost every religion. As far as I know, Christianity should spread, even to such a soulless creature as me, and enlighten me and guide me to the right path. So, maybe I can discuss what they are offering me? Or do you want Christianity to be a closed circle of people (even if it's a large one), not saying anything about atheists, etc., and they, in turn, don't say anything about Christians? Hmm! That could lead to a mess. I won't turn this into a conflict. However, under different circumstances, it would be a different conversation. And what if my discussion doesn't go well? What will happen? A reprimand? Well, the fact that you said my questions were stupid and insignificant really got to me; everything is stupid and insignificant here, only you are good. I'll say right away that all the questions in this post were rhetorical and don't require an answer; I don't want to hear this anymore. I'm not arguing that you're right about something, but there's so little of it that I don't even want to try to understand from that stream of nonsense what you wrote in this topic, what exactly it is.
Silverfale, +1. I agree. To be honest, I only see fanaticism on one side. I'll repeat once again - I'm ready to admit that I'm wrong, but only if someone points it out to me in a normal tone and with arguments. That hasn't happened yet.
P.S. Fanatics are a terrible bunch))) You can't even have a beer with them)) They'll probably stab you out of fanaticism:D