Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What Neo wrote doesn't even deserve to be commented on. It's not only nonsense, but also distorts facts. For example, the claim that Batu Khan was at the Battle of Kulikovo... Just so you know, I'm not a baptized person. And what does God and the Christian God have to do with it? I believe in God, but not in Christ, not in Allah, not in Quetzalcoatl, not in Zeus, or anyone else. And there's no need to refer to the Master or the Bible if you don't understand these books. What does the Bible say about the Antichrist? It doesn't say that he's some kind of son of Satan or something like that. I quote:
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh; this is a deceiver and an antichrist
In essence, every person who doesn't confess Christ is an antichrist. And the Antichrist as the son of Satan appears much later, when Christian dogmatists, interpreting the Bible in their own way, begin to identify him with the beast from Revelation.Siverfale;151353
Now I understand why Ar wants to become a moderator... People, don't be so fanatical! Catch is right - Christianity was created to destroy the Roman Empire... But what about the fact that Christianity united its remnants and prolonged the agony of the dying state?
Very insightful. Please consider the time difference. During the emergence of Christianity, the Roman Empire was at its peak. Christianity eroded it from within, the empire weakened, it began to be overcome by barbarians, and then the empire was forced to embrace Christianity in order to also weaken and subjugate the barbarians with its help. And they succeeded. The barbarians destroyed Rome, but they adopted Christianity and still submit to Rome ;) in the person of the Pope. Later, Byzantium did the same, effectively subjugating Rus', although it was weaker than it.
You are both ruined by excessive fanaticism and unwillingness to even CONSIDER that you might be wrong. It's pointless to continue the argument; I won't answer you, so don't even write.
What is my fanaticism? :) In the fact that I express my opinion? :) Believe me, I have practically the same attitude towards all religions, and that's why, unlike fanatical individuals, I can look at things from different perspectives. The fact that I criticize Christians is because I'm opposing these fanatics; I just really dislike stupid, stubborn, brainless fanaticism. I've encountered such people in my life. And I believe that I have the right to oppose them, as I have a pretty good understanding of religious issues, at least unlike those same fanatics, I have read the Bible ;)
P.S. I understand that I will get a negative reaction from both Neo and Catch, but I have expressed my opinion, and the rest doesn't matter much to me.
You won't get it ;) I don't like taking anything away from people, even ephemeral morale :)