Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Brak, I generally agree, but there are a few nuances:
1. The Crysis engine...
It's obvious that there's a lot of room for optimization. It's completely unoptimized, and that's why it's so terrible and consumes up to 4GB of RAM. UT3 supports twice as many features and runs much faster.
2. "Blizzard" - they're scoundrels; they've borrowed a lot of ideas, and the only thing that's truly theirs is Diablo... Besides, you may have noticed that all Blizzard games have never been known for their amazing graphics. Neither Warcraft, nor WoW, nor Diablo, nor StarCraft... Yes, they are well-balanced, but we're not talking about graphics here. Even in the demo videos (where, by the way, the graphics are always the best, as it creates an impression of the game), the graphics are far from great. I can easily name a dozen games with much better graphics... The graphics of SC2 are currently at the level of... hmm... Panzer General 2... or whatever it's called... which is already several years old.
Otherwise, I agree.