Skip to content

Consoles of our time.

User Avatar
#12
Auto-translated
No, I meant that there's nowhere for the hardware itself to develop further. Not in the sense that there won't be new graphics cards or processors, but rather that computers, you could say, haven't really changed in 10 years. They're improving, but not changing. Consoles, on the other hand, are gradually bringing us closer to a completely new platform. For example, due to the gyroscopic joysticks and large screen, they create an incredible sense of presence. This is no longer the PS1 that we played sitting in front of the TV; it's something that resembles a precursor to virtual reality... It's a shame I lost the link that showed the unreleased PS3 joystick, which changes shape and responds to everything happening in the game (handshake, recoil from a shot), and not with a small vibration, but with actual jolts. The joystick looks like a ball...
And The Witcher is really a game where the fifth chapter's quests can be impossible to complete, and the quality of the optimization makes you want to curl up in a corner in despair(((
And I also want to say that fanaticism is bad in any form. Every platform has something good, and one cannot replace the other. For example, I wouldn't be able to use only the PS3; I would wither away without StarCraft, Heroes, and many other games...
I know, but it's Microsoft that decides what and where to port, because they are the publisher.

I don't know exactly what Microsoft's policy is on this, but they simply give permission. How can you order an independent company to port something somewhere? They are not the publisher; they own the platform.

P.S.
Absolute Evil is never wrong.
You are, as always, right, my lord xD)))))
Нет, я же Гитлер.