Stay alive!!!

So, does anyone object if I summarize the interim results of the negotiations? 1. Requirements for a leader: - active (proactive) user (what are the indicators of activity?); - 30 (or 50) posts; - 2 (3) birds; - two months on the forum. 2. Requirements for a Clan: - number of participants - at least 4; - a clan member must have a positive Reputation and 5 posts (TaKo's suggestion). 3. Requirements for the existence of a Clan: - presence of 4 participants (less - disbandment); - absence of three warnings (if present - disbandment) (Qwerty's suggestion). 4. Other issues: - clan registration period - 1 (2) months; - presence of a charter in the representative topic; - combat, analytical clan. Disputed issues: 1. Requirements for a clan member. 2. Presence of warnings. 3. Control over compliance with the above requirements. 4. Activity and initiative. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Now, I'll say something about the disputed points. The requirements for a clan member are reasonable and not too demanding. In addition, I doubt anyone would accept a person with a negative Reputation into the clan. The presence of warnings and control... I've already talked about this. As long as there is no separate section and a normal inter-clan body, there can be no talk of warnings and control, otherwise there will be a lot of spam, flame, and swearing. Activity and initiative of the leader and the clan... How to calculate it: by posts, by Reputation, by the number of tournaments held, by participation in tournaments, by the frequency of appearance on the forum? Or maybe take qualitative indicators? The latter (I am based on the practice of applying laws), unfortunately, are not effective, since they are subjective and depend on the opinion and views of the person applying them. A combination of quantity and quality? But what should it look like? Please explain to me, I don't understand. And again, regardless of how activity is assessed, this item cannot be introduced without control. Read above about control. In short... I suggest that we reduce all issues to a vote. The leader of each clan leaves a post in which he answers the following questions: 1. Requirements for the clan leader. 2. Requirements for the clan. 3. Requirements for the existence of the clan. 4. Other issues. As far as I understand, there can only be two answer options, and I will answer myself now: 1. Requirements for the clan leader. - how many posts should the prospective leader have? (30/50) 50 - what Reputation should the leader have? (2/3) three birds - is it necessary to set a period of stay on the forum (two months)? (yes/no) yes 2. Requirements for the clan. - should the number of participants be 4 or more? (yes/no) yes - should a clan member have a positive Reputation and 5 posts? (yes/no) yes 3. Requirements for the existence of the clan. - should the clan be disbanded if there are fewer than 4 participants for 4 months on the forum? (yes/no) yes - should the clan be disbanded if there is no leader (i.e., he is not present at all and no replacement has been found) for 2 months? (yes/no) yes - should the clan be disbanded if there are fewer than 4 participants in the clan for two months? (yes/no) yes 4. Other issues. - is it necessary to have a charter in the representative topic? (yes/no) yes It's very simple. I suggest organizing such a local democracy. The rules are simple, if there are more than two answer options for any item, it is included in the new regulation. The issue of warnings, about control, is not worth it for the reasons mentioned above. Please answer only the specified questions. Leave everything else "overboard" - I doubt that this will find support from above :). Now, specifics. TaKo, advertising is always needed (it is the engine of progress). With your post, you, unfortunately, proved that LZMS is a closed, inward-looking body (closed not in the sense that it does not accept members, but in the sense that the activities of LZMS are the activities of two or three clans - the initiators). How can you talk about joining LZMS if it is not clear "what this thing is and what it is for"? Nimizida, everything that does not concern the regulations on clans is irrelevant. And there is no need to open a topic. Why? So that everything sinks into... eee... sinks, in general? In addition, those who wish can write in the "General Clan Topic". Well, gentlemen and ladies, let's begin? Otherwise, we'll jump from one topic to another :D