Nimizida
Auto-translated
Everything is FINE. (not to be confused with a swear word)
We are again returning to an unproductive discussion that will not yield any results.:smile35:
In my opinion, if you want to make comments about a Clan, they should be for such offenses as – a whole group mocking a homeless person in the street –.:smile30: But I don't think there are such people here, and there are no homeless people (if someone has such a nickname, my apologies). Therefore, this is unnecessary; we lived without it, and we will continue to live, I think even Qwerty would agree.:smile42:
Further, Adelaide, I don't think 50 posts is right; I would stop at 30; I haven't seen any disputes about this number.
Morale, I don't think this is such a necessary factor; personally, I, like many in my coalition, need it so that the old-timers don't get upset (if someone is offended, I didn't mean it):smile36:
I don't know; personally, I am ready to take the blame together with the guilty person from my group; I will not back down from this; you just need to look at things more broadly. For example, I have two penalties that have basically expired; I would also not mind discussing this issue, because otherwise, you can bring anyone down.
If some people want new positions, well, let them create a league of cartographers, a league of translators, and so on. And what will we get? I think that only one Clan was created in the last quarter, and the other is completely paralyzed. In my opinion, a Clan is alive if there is at least one Keeper of the Clan Flame in it, but when a Clan is idle for a couple of months, and everyone knows that it is dying, and no one dares to clean it up, and everyone rejects those who want to revive it, I would personally give such a Clan a couple of warnings! I think that this state of affairs is wrong (the only one who dared has now been banned, and I think this is unfair).
I think that if someone misbehaves in a Clan, then the Clan should not be criticized but helped with advice first. But you are all here like animals, constantly coming up with stricter and stricter rules.
Yes, I agree that all the moderators are doing their job; there is no dispute about this, but I personally think that when power is distributed, it functions better (or when it is in one hand, but one person cannot do everything, so the first option is better). That is, all the moderators were working correctly, and no one had any complaints about them, so let it continue to be so. If a post about a new Clan appears, vultures immediately swoop in. They peck and peck and often peck to death, but those who continue to stand their ground, I think, and I believe that moderators and leaders can take a couple of seconds to help them, and these new rules of yours are a net negative; I would look at the issue from a different angle. That is, not to create laws but to help new leaders; perhaps the moderators are busy, but the leaders of the Clans always have a free minute, and by the way, if you give the deputies power, they will be able to solve exactly these problems.
Let's be honest, the leader decides the issues of the Clan, and the deputy helps and, in addition, exercising their right to moderation, solves some issues, and even the issues of new Clans. And in the format that I proposed, that is, as a form of assistance!
Well, is that fair?:cool:
We are again returning to an unproductive discussion that will not yield any results.:smile35:
In my opinion, if you want to make comments about a Clan, they should be for such offenses as – a whole group mocking a homeless person in the street –.:smile30: But I don't think there are such people here, and there are no homeless people (if someone has such a nickname, my apologies). Therefore, this is unnecessary; we lived without it, and we will continue to live, I think even Qwerty would agree.:smile42:
Further, Adelaide, I don't think 50 posts is right; I would stop at 30; I haven't seen any disputes about this number.
Morale, I don't think this is such a necessary factor; personally, I, like many in my coalition, need it so that the old-timers don't get upset (if someone is offended, I didn't mean it):smile36:
I don't know; personally, I am ready to take the blame together with the guilty person from my group; I will not back down from this; you just need to look at things more broadly. For example, I have two penalties that have basically expired; I would also not mind discussing this issue, because otherwise, you can bring anyone down.
If some people want new positions, well, let them create a league of cartographers, a league of translators, and so on. And what will we get? I think that only one Clan was created in the last quarter, and the other is completely paralyzed. In my opinion, a Clan is alive if there is at least one Keeper of the Clan Flame in it, but when a Clan is idle for a couple of months, and everyone knows that it is dying, and no one dares to clean it up, and everyone rejects those who want to revive it, I would personally give such a Clan a couple of warnings! I think that this state of affairs is wrong (the only one who dared has now been banned, and I think this is unfair).
I think that if someone misbehaves in a Clan, then the Clan should not be criticized but helped with advice first. But you are all here like animals, constantly coming up with stricter and stricter rules.
Yes, I agree that all the moderators are doing their job; there is no dispute about this, but I personally think that when power is distributed, it functions better (or when it is in one hand, but one person cannot do everything, so the first option is better). That is, all the moderators were working correctly, and no one had any complaints about them, so let it continue to be so. If a post about a new Clan appears, vultures immediately swoop in. They peck and peck and often peck to death, but those who continue to stand their ground, I think, and I believe that moderators and leaders can take a couple of seconds to help them, and these new rules of yours are a net negative; I would look at the issue from a different angle. That is, not to create laws but to help new leaders; perhaps the moderators are busy, but the leaders of the Clans always have a free minute, and by the way, if you give the deputies power, they will be able to solve exactly these problems.
Let's be honest, the leader decides the issues of the Clan, and the deputy helps and, in addition, exercising their right to moderation, solves some issues, and even the issues of new Clans. And in the format that I proposed, that is, as a form of assistance!
Well, is that fair?:cool:
Набор в клан "Рыцари апокалипсиса" - "Knights of Apocalypse"
Информация о нас здесь http://sacraments.narod.ru/Klan.html
Информация о нас здесь http://sacraments.narod.ru/Klan.html