Stay alive!!!

It's quite simple here. Only remarks from a certain inter-clan body should be taken into account, and that's it... All interested parties gather, listen to both sides, the accusation and the defense, then the defense can propose a settlement – apologies, post corrections, or a ban, etc. If that is sufficient, the incident is resolved ("resolved," a quote from Mayakovsky). If a remark is issued by a majority vote, then that's how it will be. There will be a hearing in the Vanechka case – the clan will present at least one lawyer. If we can reach an agreement, there will be no remark. If we can't, my clan will receive a remark. Any remark should have an "expiration date," which, as I think, should coincide with the disqualification period. And I, of course, am responsible for the actions of my clan members.