Stay alive!!!

Let's stick with three bird icons. Draco is right. Regarding the feedback: I insist that this feedback is directed at clan members. Let me explain my position. The clan MUST be responsible for its members. The clan leader should think carefully before accepting someone into the clan. This is even more important when organizing events, let's say, a "mini-flash mob," where the clan coordinates and begins to perform mass actions. In this case, at most 1-2 members will receive feedback, and that's it. But if this feedback starts to affect the clan's overall standing, that's a more serious issue. Regarding the 7-month period, I'm not insisting. It can be 6 months, or even 4. But definitely not less than 3. Regarding tournament players, Adelaide is right. And the devastating impact that the charming Ta, Kotoraya had is further proof of this. Regarding analytical work: We have Mugais in our clan. He doesn't play in tournaments, but he has his own research in the field of updates and other related topics. We have AmberSoler in our clan, who plays here relatively rarely, but his contribution to the third Heroes game is invaluable, I think you'll agree! We have... hmm... me. I write about the second Heroes game and also try to translate foreign materials. Judging by the users' reactions, it has also been useful to someone. And then there are the map creators! This is what I call analytical work. However, I'm not insisting on this either. For me, the two key points are Draco's proposal for three leader bird icons and the inclusion of member feedback in the clan's overall standing.