Аделаида
Auto-translated
We need to minimize our wishes, because "the further into the forest, the thicker the partisans" — we've already started talking about clan-related remarks, in which I see no practical value. If an individual violates HeroesWorld rules, the ban system kicks in; I think this point is clear and logical.
Reper, in his position, has covered all the key essential points. Let's not complicate things or drag out the resolution of this issue. Instead, let's clearly and concisely tell people: to register a clan, one must:............, a clan is disbanded if:.......... Otherwise, it's hard for me to pick out the significant information needed for the final list from among your posts.
For now, I am providing a consolidated list. I am using average numerical data since we will not reach a consensus or unanimous opinion. I am taking the opinions of the clans "Order of the Phoenix" and "E Pluribus Unum" from Reper's position, the link to which I provided above. (If your opinion on this matter has changed, please correct me.)
1. To register a clan:
- A person must have been registered on HeroesWorld for 2 months.
- They must have 50 posts and 2 positive reputation points (for those who want to argue about this, I'll explain: a clan leader is not just a forum member or a player; they are a socially active person (within HeroesWorld), they must be well-known and respected on the forum. It's clear that posts can be padded, but in cases of malicious padding, going overboard, or non-informative posts, we have our vigilant moderators).
- There should be no requirements for clan members (each clan has its own "kitchen": hierarchy, trial periods, etc. Let each leader decide what their clanmates will be like. And Draco is not entirely right about champion players; Perpolken is not outside clans because he is opposed to the idea of clans — just look at the stellar lineup of the Order of the Phoenix, Homi Homini, Lord Vampyr alone speaks volumes!)
2. A clan should be disbanded if 2/3 of its members have not appeared on the forum for 4 months, if its numerical strength is less than 4 people for 2 months, and if the clan is left without a leader and no replacement is found within 2 months.
I want to clarify regarding the people who will monitor compliance with the rules: the word "overseers" is inapplicable. They will simply be executors who will check the data against the template of clan registration requirements and see whether the requirements are met or not. There is no personal initiative here, no recommendations — just a dry "yes" or "no". If "no", they can explain that a certain requirement does not meet the established norm. As for the LZMS, I just suggested it; I am not insisting. It's just that I personally have more trust in forum members who are on the LZMS council. It could be someone else — I would suggest Reper, since he "cares deeply" about the clan movement. It was suggested that coordinators monitor this, but alas, I'm afraid I personally cannot handle it (I am involved in tournament activities, lead a clan, and do coordinator work... I simply don't have enough time, energy, and perseverance to fulfill any more duties). I won't say anything about VDV and Hacker; if they volunteer, that would be great. As for moderators, their personal consent is also needed, since moderators are not just people with a green nickname — they have their own workload, and this monitoring might be a burden. But in any case, whoever these people are, they must first and foremost be trusted and respected by the forum members.
Reper, in his position, has covered all the key essential points. Let's not complicate things or drag out the resolution of this issue. Instead, let's clearly and concisely tell people: to register a clan, one must:............, a clan is disbanded if:.......... Otherwise, it's hard for me to pick out the significant information needed for the final list from among your posts.
For now, I am providing a consolidated list. I am using average numerical data since we will not reach a consensus or unanimous opinion. I am taking the opinions of the clans "Order of the Phoenix" and "E Pluribus Unum" from Reper's position, the link to which I provided above. (If your opinion on this matter has changed, please correct me.)
1. To register a clan:
- A person must have been registered on HeroesWorld for 2 months.
- They must have 50 posts and 2 positive reputation points (for those who want to argue about this, I'll explain: a clan leader is not just a forum member or a player; they are a socially active person (within HeroesWorld), they must be well-known and respected on the forum. It's clear that posts can be padded, but in cases of malicious padding, going overboard, or non-informative posts, we have our vigilant moderators).
- There should be no requirements for clan members (each clan has its own "kitchen": hierarchy, trial periods, etc. Let each leader decide what their clanmates will be like. And Draco is not entirely right about champion players; Perpolken is not outside clans because he is opposed to the idea of clans — just look at the stellar lineup of the Order of the Phoenix, Homi Homini, Lord Vampyr alone speaks volumes!)
2. A clan should be disbanded if 2/3 of its members have not appeared on the forum for 4 months, if its numerical strength is less than 4 people for 2 months, and if the clan is left without a leader and no replacement is found within 2 months.
I want to clarify regarding the people who will monitor compliance with the rules: the word "overseers" is inapplicable. They will simply be executors who will check the data against the template of clan registration requirements and see whether the requirements are met or not. There is no personal initiative here, no recommendations — just a dry "yes" or "no". If "no", they can explain that a certain requirement does not meet the established norm. As for the LZMS, I just suggested it; I am not insisting. It's just that I personally have more trust in forum members who are on the LZMS council. It could be someone else — I would suggest Reper, since he "cares deeply" about the clan movement. It was suggested that coordinators monitor this, but alas, I'm afraid I personally cannot handle it (I am involved in tournament activities, lead a clan, and do coordinator work... I simply don't have enough time, energy, and perseverance to fulfill any more duties). I won't say anything about VDV and Hacker; if they volunteer, that would be great. As for moderators, their personal consent is also needed, since moderators are not just people with a green nickname — they have their own workload, and this monitoring might be a burden. But in any case, whoever these people are, they must first and foremost be trusted and respected by the forum members.