I don't understand something... Why are you all averaging the 36 scores? It's silly to average all 36??? I think that for the first campaign, there should be one rating, a winner is determined, and then everything is reset, the next campaign is played, there's a new winner, and so on! And at the end of all seven campaigns, the rating is summed up... Correct me if I'm wrong???

P.S.: As for the reason, I'm not arguing... but 10% isn't that much. 800 - 10% = 720, well, you could make it 5%! I just said 10%...
For example, it was the same with those who missed one stage of the Blitz Tournament or the Grand Tournament stage. It was even tougher!!!