Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I don't understand... Why are you averaging all 36? It's silly to average all 36??? I think it should be like this: for the first campaign, there's one rating, a winner is determined, and then everything is reset. The next campaign is played, a new winner is determined, and so on! And at the end of all seven campaigns, the rating is summed up... Correct me if I'm wrong???
P.S.: I'm not arguing about the reason... but 10% isn't that much. 800 - 10% = 720, so you could make it 5%! I just said 10% as an example...
For example, it was the same with those who missed one stage of the Blitz Tournament or the VK stage. It was even stricter!!!