Light or Darkness?

Maybe we shouldn't confuse philosophical questions and concepts with natural phenomena and physics? We'll end up agreeing that light is a stream of photons, which have no mass but do have energy... and so on. We all studied physics in school.

Here's my take: physics as a science emerged from philosophy (just as algebra emerged from arithmetic). This is an UNDENIABLE fact, proven by thousands of examples, from the ideologies of both sciences to the similarity of their methods. In general, the only difference between philosophy and physics is formulas. 50% of physics is philosophy – that is, the description and understanding of ongoing processes, as well as the creation of hypotheses – all of this is philosophy; the rest are formulas. Now, about the topic: Light or Darkness? I don't even know. The world is dark. Darkness is easier; you don't have to fight or resist. For the individual, it promises benefits, money, health, and power. But you can't live in darkness. Then you chase after pleasures, greater power, and sink into sin – drugs, sex, alcohol, cruelty, self-love. And then you become addicted to all of this, and that's it – the person is dead, only the body lives. But real life happens in struggle – that's when you're truly alive, that's when you're enlightened. No matter how contradictory it may seem, a world without war is the domain of darkness, while struggle is the domain of light. Because light always fights against darkness, and darkness, in turn, corrupts. And it's much easier to fall into darkness than to emerge into the light.