Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I am "for" banning the enhancer for the Necromancers. Skeletons are already strong enough. In the second or third week, skeletons can kill everyone, while the vampires will only get in the way)). In the last game as Necromancers, I practically didn't buy any troops until the final battle. Skeletons killed everyone they saw.
So, is it correct: can it be used up to level 3 inclusive, or not? This inconsistency has already been written about on the forum.
In this version of the rules, if a banned hero reaches level 3, he must be dismissed in the same turn. But the question arose: what should be done with a banned hero from the dungeon, who, for example, is level 30? A proposal arose to change this point to the following: "if the level of a banned hero increases by 2 from the initial level, then such a hero must be dismissed immediately." Something like that. I don't care either way, and I am "for the majority."
This sequence of actions misses an important point; guess what it is :-D